1. What is the purpose for the conditioned Reality?
2. What created the conditioned Reality? Is there any proof that it was expressly created?
3. The Unconditioned by definition has no complete description. One cannot even ask what is the purpose of the Unconditioned as any purpose would be proof that it is not Unconditioned. Since there is no proof for the Unconditioned, where from the claim for the existence for the Unconditioned?
Reality, whether tangible or not cannot be unconditioned as Reality can be described. The "Unconditioned" cannot be described.
Reality as describable (thus conditioned) and the unconditioned as indescribable—"Unconditioned Reality" can be classified as an oxymoron. The term combines two concepts that, are inherently contradictory: a describable reality and an indescribable unconditioned. This contradiction arises because describing something as "reality" imposes a conditioned framework, which the unconditioned, by definition, cannot possess.
Thank you very much! 💚❤️💚
Such a heartwarming article. Every atom of every cell of my being bows to His name ❤️
My dialog with Grok in trying to understand the "Unconditioned Reality" can be downloaded here:
https://drive.proton.me/urls/V18RY5V44C#Yj2IzS0WdUNi
Questions:
1. What is the purpose for the conditioned Reality?
2. What created the conditioned Reality? Is there any proof that it was expressly created?
3. The Unconditioned by definition has no complete description. One cannot even ask what is the purpose of the Unconditioned as any purpose would be proof that it is not Unconditioned. Since there is no proof for the Unconditioned, where from the claim for the existence for the Unconditioned?
Reality, whether tangible or not cannot be unconditioned as Reality can be described. The "Unconditioned" cannot be described.
Reality as describable (thus conditioned) and the unconditioned as indescribable—"Unconditioned Reality" can be classified as an oxymoron. The term combines two concepts that, are inherently contradictory: a describable reality and an indescribable unconditioned. This contradiction arises because describing something as "reality" imposes a conditioned framework, which the unconditioned, by definition, cannot possess.